qCzar
Apr 20, 02:45 AM
Does anyone know of the differences between the Canon XTi and the T1i? I had a XTi prior and had purchased a remote shutter release for the 40D and 50D (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002N65P7W/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_3?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=B003VW27H8&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=072A1AET52BYAVQVGAC4) but was able to purchase a 2.5mm male-to-male cable with success to my Canon XTi. I sold the XTi a few months back and bought the T1i even farther back but I never used the remote on the T1i. Now, I need to but can't get the camera to recognize the remote. The remote and cable are both the same, so I'm assuming the way the T1i reads the signal input has changed.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to how I can get this to work? I'd rather not spend the money for a new shutter release but if it comes down to the point I must, well, then I must.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to how I can get this to work? I'd rather not spend the money for a new shutter release but if it comes down to the point I must, well, then I must.
jedisaga
Feb 9, 08:24 AM
Hi,
Does anyone know if there are any quality leather cases available for the ipod touch 4g? I've seen a few faux leather cases but...
jedisaga
Does anyone know if there are any quality leather cases available for the ipod touch 4g? I've seen a few faux leather cases but...
jedisaga
episkeptis
Apr 1, 06:18 AM
Hello, i start to work with xcode 4 an application for mac and i use 4-5 different windows, eveything works well so far but i want to know when i have a window active how all the other windows are inactive.
Is it works in xcode or i have to make one single window and change views?
Is it works in xcode or i have to make one single window and change views?
Alaerian
Mar 10, 10:27 PM
I've always thought that the 'S' was a one time thing used to get the numbering right on the iPhone's sequence, because the iPhone 2 had the number 3 in its name. I think this year's model will just be named iPhone 5.
Screw that. I vote they move towards a naming system like with OSX. Instead of using big cats, they use fruit.
Next iteration of iPhone = iPhone Banana.
After that, iPhone Papaya.
Screw that. I vote they move towards a naming system like with OSX. Instead of using big cats, they use fruit.
Next iteration of iPhone = iPhone Banana.
After that, iPhone Papaya.
Malik
Sep 22, 03:54 PM
I have a highend PC running Windows XP pro. Athlon 64 w/ 6600GT 256mb and 2Gb of DDR400 (low latancy), and two hard drives in RAID0 (2x 160GB).
I use the system for allsorts of things, games, internet, email, dvd's, creative stuff like messing with video/images that sort of thing (i have a good size Dell screen (24inch) which makes it a nice machine for playing DVD's in the bedroom. The thing is loud though, i mean too loud to have on when im trying to work proper and im not playing music or have something else as a distraction. Even playing some RTS's can become annoying cos of the noise..
I was waiting on the outcome of the apple expo to see if there were any updates. But there is also this Intel thing. the MacMini looks good but i want a system that will expand like a PC and the mini is crippled from the offset with that graphics card (i dont like ATi stuff in general either anyways) and the hard drive is way too small. The iMac G5 is a lil better but its still a bit lacking, i read a review and they said the graphics card is the limiting factor for 'future' potential and its not a good system if you like to play games too.
I think the Pmac is the only option for me, you can get a 6800 ultra for it so that should be a nice upgrade to whats in my a64 right now. There isnt one certain game i play in windows, and ive looked over the games for Mac on apples site and the good ones id play seem to be all there (UT2004!! Fine with me.) but im looking at spending a good chunck of $$$ on this - the pm isnt cheap.
I was considering moving to an apple system in Feb but i ended up upgrading my pc instead because i wasent totally sure. Now ive made the choice im thinking i should forget it now that apple have said they are changing processors. I wuld like to buy a 2.7 G5, 2gig RAM, 2x 400gb HDD and the 6800 Ultra and hook that up to my current dell monitor but i want some info about whats coming soon.
Is it worth spending on the current systems, cos if i buy software (like i get photoshop with it) and they are moving to intel it seems kinda pointless. Like im wasting my money - i wish apple would announce something to let people interested in switching know what the score is. I read different stuff but most people are saying the G4/5 is dead, and apple arent gonna be spending anymore time on it - so even if they keep some legacy support for it to keep people happy that means that osx/software wont be optimized anymore right? They wont focus on making it run better on the PPC when the Intels are the 'new' thing. They will want everyone to get intel for that.
Should i stick it out my PC and wait for the Intel Power Macs? I was thinking of having both but id like to do a complete switch relly. I wouldnt use the PC so it would be pointless to keep it (Ill sell it on QXL i guss).
edit::
I wuld have already gone ahed with the system if i hadent read up about the intel stuff. i looked in some other forums and i dunno what to make of it, seems like everyone is just bs'ing when they dont know anything for sure. 2006 was when i was told intel systems would arrive.
I use the system for allsorts of things, games, internet, email, dvd's, creative stuff like messing with video/images that sort of thing (i have a good size Dell screen (24inch) which makes it a nice machine for playing DVD's in the bedroom. The thing is loud though, i mean too loud to have on when im trying to work proper and im not playing music or have something else as a distraction. Even playing some RTS's can become annoying cos of the noise..
I was waiting on the outcome of the apple expo to see if there were any updates. But there is also this Intel thing. the MacMini looks good but i want a system that will expand like a PC and the mini is crippled from the offset with that graphics card (i dont like ATi stuff in general either anyways) and the hard drive is way too small. The iMac G5 is a lil better but its still a bit lacking, i read a review and they said the graphics card is the limiting factor for 'future' potential and its not a good system if you like to play games too.
I think the Pmac is the only option for me, you can get a 6800 ultra for it so that should be a nice upgrade to whats in my a64 right now. There isnt one certain game i play in windows, and ive looked over the games for Mac on apples site and the good ones id play seem to be all there (UT2004!! Fine with me.) but im looking at spending a good chunck of $$$ on this - the pm isnt cheap.
I was considering moving to an apple system in Feb but i ended up upgrading my pc instead because i wasent totally sure. Now ive made the choice im thinking i should forget it now that apple have said they are changing processors. I wuld like to buy a 2.7 G5, 2gig RAM, 2x 400gb HDD and the 6800 Ultra and hook that up to my current dell monitor but i want some info about whats coming soon.
Is it worth spending on the current systems, cos if i buy software (like i get photoshop with it) and they are moving to intel it seems kinda pointless. Like im wasting my money - i wish apple would announce something to let people interested in switching know what the score is. I read different stuff but most people are saying the G4/5 is dead, and apple arent gonna be spending anymore time on it - so even if they keep some legacy support for it to keep people happy that means that osx/software wont be optimized anymore right? They wont focus on making it run better on the PPC when the Intels are the 'new' thing. They will want everyone to get intel for that.
Should i stick it out my PC and wait for the Intel Power Macs? I was thinking of having both but id like to do a complete switch relly. I wouldnt use the PC so it would be pointless to keep it (Ill sell it on QXL i guss).
edit::
I wuld have already gone ahed with the system if i hadent read up about the intel stuff. i looked in some other forums and i dunno what to make of it, seems like everyone is just bs'ing when they dont know anything for sure. 2006 was when i was told intel systems would arrive.
saberahul
Mar 17, 09:56 PM
LOL No, that's the company store and it still exists.
http://www.apple.com/companystore/
Quite an upgrade from 1997 I'd say :p
http://www.apple.com/companystore/
Quite an upgrade from 1997 I'd say :p
maggieQ
May 6, 01:32 AM
sorry i didn't find one as wallet.but i find a armband sport case for you,i think it will bring you a lot of convenience as well! price is $3.72.http://www.shoppingkool.com/Armband-Sport-Case-for-Apple-iPod-Nano-3rd-Generation-Black-_pid20920.html
mloffa
Mar 11, 10:41 AM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
Couple more people. Guy from Apple store said they would be letting people in later in batches of about 12-20.
Couple more people. Guy from Apple store said they would be letting people in later in batches of about 12-20.
pcypert
Mar 18, 12:16 AM
You need the original as well...most have it highly discounted though...and I think you can just download it from blizzard and set up an account that way...
Paul
Paul
emmawu
Sep 18, 11:20 AM
Make sure you get checked out medically. I was in a car accident that I thought just banged me up a bit and two days later found out I had a broken knee cap. I wish I would've been checked out sooner. It just takes longer to recover. Best wishes.
IJ Reilly
Aug 14, 11:49 AM
The potentially bad part about this investigation is during the time of the options Apple had no "compensation committee".All compensation was approved by the board of directors.This could put Jobs in a bad position.
I think this was SOP at most corporations until recently.
I think this was SOP at most corporations until recently.
Doctor Q
Oct 24, 05:10 PM
Like most policies, it's there for a reason and is intended to benefit the overall membership.
There's a tradeoff among three less-than-perfect choices for a user's title when they are temporarily banned:
1. No change in title. The results: Posts by other users complaining that the user is rude, a hit-and-run troll, a scammer, or some other kind of troublemaker because they didn't reply to posts directed at them, even when they had asked for help, they didn't reply when their opinion was challenged, they didn't reply to PMs about Marketplace deals, etc.
2. "Banned" title. The results: Posts by other users complaining (or celebrating) that the user was permanently banned, because they don't know it's only temporary. Other users would also send emails and PMs and Contact forms to the administrator and moderators, because they thought a member in time-out had been permanently banned.
Note: #2 is vBulletin's default user title for a user with a temporary ban.
3. "In Time-Out". The results: Posts by other users complaining (or celebrating) that the user was temporarily banned.
#1 has the benefit of better user privacy but #1 and #2 don't do them any favors, since people end up talking about them, calling more attention to their change in status. And #1 gives people a bad impression of them for false reasons. #1 and #2 waste everyone's time and lead to misunderstandings. We switched to #3 because of these very real problems. The problems shown above for #3 occur much less frequently and aren't as serious.
The "In Time-Out" title was never intended to be a warning to other users.
#3 isn't as private as would be ideal, but neither is #1. Experience shows that other users notice when a regular user stops posting, so other users know something happened even if the user title doesn't change. #3 gives the bare minimal amount of information and we don't share the details with anyone but the timed-out user. It's a compromise that has served us well to prevent the problem outlined above.
The title of "In Time-Out" could be some other phrase but it's not clear that it would change the reactions of those who notice user titles and know what they mean. We added the "Guest" user title for cases where a user no longer has an account but has not been banned, to avoid the stigma associated with a banned or timed-out status. It too would have the same meaning no matter what phrase is used.
We'd rather not see gossip about users in time-out. If you report such posts, the moderators can remove them and this will increase user privacy, particularly because the user title will return to normal after the time-out but the posts will otherwise remain.
There's a tradeoff among three less-than-perfect choices for a user's title when they are temporarily banned:
1. No change in title. The results: Posts by other users complaining that the user is rude, a hit-and-run troll, a scammer, or some other kind of troublemaker because they didn't reply to posts directed at them, even when they had asked for help, they didn't reply when their opinion was challenged, they didn't reply to PMs about Marketplace deals, etc.
2. "Banned" title. The results: Posts by other users complaining (or celebrating) that the user was permanently banned, because they don't know it's only temporary. Other users would also send emails and PMs and Contact forms to the administrator and moderators, because they thought a member in time-out had been permanently banned.
Note: #2 is vBulletin's default user title for a user with a temporary ban.
3. "In Time-Out". The results: Posts by other users complaining (or celebrating) that the user was temporarily banned.
#1 has the benefit of better user privacy but #1 and #2 don't do them any favors, since people end up talking about them, calling more attention to their change in status. And #1 gives people a bad impression of them for false reasons. #1 and #2 waste everyone's time and lead to misunderstandings. We switched to #3 because of these very real problems. The problems shown above for #3 occur much less frequently and aren't as serious.
The "In Time-Out" title was never intended to be a warning to other users.
#3 isn't as private as would be ideal, but neither is #1. Experience shows that other users notice when a regular user stops posting, so other users know something happened even if the user title doesn't change. #3 gives the bare minimal amount of information and we don't share the details with anyone but the timed-out user. It's a compromise that has served us well to prevent the problem outlined above.
The title of "In Time-Out" could be some other phrase but it's not clear that it would change the reactions of those who notice user titles and know what they mean. We added the "Guest" user title for cases where a user no longer has an account but has not been banned, to avoid the stigma associated with a banned or timed-out status. It too would have the same meaning no matter what phrase is used.
We'd rather not see gossip about users in time-out. If you report such posts, the moderators can remove them and this will increase user privacy, particularly because the user title will return to normal after the time-out but the posts will otherwise remain.
supafuzz
Mar 29, 03:20 PM
Got a pair and one speaker is messed up..looking for exact replacement
thanks
thanks
Pngwyn
Mar 27, 05:37 PM
Ahh thanks for the responses. Sorry for my ignorance, I had no idea 3.0 wasn't compatible, I just assumed it worked since the plug fits :P Yes I am using a new model macbook pro (well waiting for it to arrive, anyway)
You mentioned "when it does gain support" does that mean there is talk of updating drivers, or is it more likely that it will only be supported in future updates of the Macbook model itself?
Also about OWC, I wasn't able to find any that were NOT run off an external power source so I assumed the Western Digital 640gb was the only size available. I'm on the go a lot, so I don't always have a convenient outlet to plug an external into.
You mentioned "when it does gain support" does that mean there is talk of updating drivers, or is it more likely that it will only be supported in future updates of the Macbook model itself?
Also about OWC, I wasn't able to find any that were NOT run off an external power source so I assumed the Western Digital 640gb was the only size available. I'm on the go a lot, so I don't always have a convenient outlet to plug an external into.
ZballZ
Mar 15, 04:39 AM
KeithPratt makes the very valid point that every mp4 isn't equal and it is quite possible to make a video from an HD file that is too complex to read by some machines.
Also, an m4v is simply an mp4 with a different extension. Change the file name from X.m4v to X.mp4 and it will play better on some equipment. Handbrake allows you to choose which extension you prefer, but you can always change the the extension after you've encoded the file.
You might also ask your clients to install a program called VLC, which is excellent at playing a wide variety of file types.
Thx for the help. I will try to change to MP4, instead of M4V. I still dont understand how some files would play, and some not, when I've used the same presets?? Is there any way that I can get complete codec-compression info off of the files now? Just to double-check if they differ in any way?
Also, an m4v is simply an mp4 with a different extension. Change the file name from X.m4v to X.mp4 and it will play better on some equipment. Handbrake allows you to choose which extension you prefer, but you can always change the the extension after you've encoded the file.
You might also ask your clients to install a program called VLC, which is excellent at playing a wide variety of file types.
Thx for the help. I will try to change to MP4, instead of M4V. I still dont understand how some files would play, and some not, when I've used the same presets?? Is there any way that I can get complete codec-compression info off of the files now? Just to double-check if they differ in any way?
MacRumorUser
Mar 22, 05:14 AM
wow I can't wait to see what the future holds!
A bunch of ****** game to movie tie-ins obviously.
A bunch of ****** game to movie tie-ins obviously.
Dav1
Apr 5, 07:01 AM
Thanks for that heads up! :) there have been a few updates since I posted this and the current version of iFile now works...
yellow
Sep 19, 09:33 AM
Only 14 hours & 51 minutes left, people! It's currently up to $5700!
CP1091
Feb 5, 02:06 PM
Responded.. waiting for your response :)
Full of Win
Feb 16, 05:03 PM
I know this is a sensitive issue, but when a paper like the Daily Mail runs a story, its news.
Cancer-stricken Apple boss Steve Jobs 'may have just six weeks to live,' say doctors
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Last updated at 10:05 PM on 16th February 2011
Comments (0) Add to My Stories
Apple founder Steve Jobs has lost an alarming amount of weight and is reportedly in his final days.
The computer genius behind the iPod, iPhone and iPad is stricken with pancreatic cancer and may have just six weeks to live.
Shocking new photos show Mr Jobs looking painfully frail and weak, with his jeans and dark top hanging loosely on his 6ft 2in, rail-thin body.
admin edit: Please include full links to any stories posted.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1357743/Cancer-stricken-Apple-boss-Steve-Jobs-just-weeks-live.html#ixzz1EAGvXVtj
Cancer-stricken Apple boss Steve Jobs 'may have just six weeks to live,' say doctors
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Last updated at 10:05 PM on 16th February 2011
Comments (0) Add to My Stories
Apple founder Steve Jobs has lost an alarming amount of weight and is reportedly in his final days.
The computer genius behind the iPod, iPhone and iPad is stricken with pancreatic cancer and may have just six weeks to live.
Shocking new photos show Mr Jobs looking painfully frail and weak, with his jeans and dark top hanging loosely on his 6ft 2in, rail-thin body.
admin edit: Please include full links to any stories posted.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1357743/Cancer-stricken-Apple-boss-Steve-Jobs-just-weeks-live.html#ixzz1EAGvXVtj
Dav1
Mar 23, 08:23 PM
Ahh, no previous owner as this is brand new iPad on 3.2, so I don't think any SHSH was saved :(
So I am out of luck then to go to 4.2? I pretty much MUST go to 4.3 if I want to upgrade my firmware at all?
Your only choice to upgrade is 4.3 today.
If you upgrade you will lose the ability to fully use the camera connection kit, on the other hand your GPS if a 3G model will improve, and you'll get gestures, and a larger selection of software...
Have you done the tiny umbrella bit yet? This does not do anything to your iPad, and will at least allow you to return to the 4.3 software version...
So I am out of luck then to go to 4.2? I pretty much MUST go to 4.3 if I want to upgrade my firmware at all?
Your only choice to upgrade is 4.3 today.
If you upgrade you will lose the ability to fully use the camera connection kit, on the other hand your GPS if a 3G model will improve, and you'll get gestures, and a larger selection of software...
Have you done the tiny umbrella bit yet? This does not do anything to your iPad, and will at least allow you to return to the 4.3 software version...
ddtlm
Aug 30, 01:52 PM
TyleRomeo:
Oh, oops I guess my memory was playing tricks on me. Good to see that the ETA is actually dropping. :)
Oh, oops I guess my memory was playing tricks on me. Good to see that the ETA is actually dropping. :)
blackwind
May 3, 09:15 AM
Thanks to Set845 who the one willing to upload his AirView.ipa and .zip for everyone here. Hopefullly someone here will find it usefull.
Thanks Set845 (Paul) for all your effort tonite
:)
**edit use this one http://www.mediafire.com/?t35td9ajwu82j
enjoy
Thanks Set845 (Paul) for all your effort tonite
:)
**edit use this one http://www.mediafire.com/?t35td9ajwu82j
enjoy
FourCandles
Nov 12, 12:44 PM
Truly wonderful pictures. The Nile one is awe-inspiring. Thanks to iBlue.
There seem to be slightly larger versions of some on the NASA site. I think this is an enhanced version of the Nile shot:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/46000/46820/ISS025-E-09858_lrg.jpg
The angle has been changed but the cloud patterns seem the same.
There seem to be slightly larger versions of some on the NASA site. I think this is an enhanced version of the Nile shot:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/46000/46820/ISS025-E-09858_lrg.jpg
The angle has been changed but the cloud patterns seem the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment