Alex23
May 4, 10:44 PM
Hey,
Yes the it is found in the System Profiler.
It is written when I go to network preferences : Cable unplugged which is wrong. The cable is plugged and the modem is working as checked by the technician.
ethernet:
from Make It and Love It.
Love it, and hope this will
Head over to Make It and Love
CD release of Make Love w/
Make Floral Layouts - Love ya
make you more love it.
LET#39;S MAKE LOVE
Make It And Love It has of
to make but i love it and
to make because I love it
Ashley from Make It and Love
(Picture from Make It and Love
at Make it and Love it.
Let#39;s make love (1960)
Learn how to make it @ Make It
I used tutorials from Make It
Why do I love it?
And it really screws up my day
Yes the it is found in the System Profiler.
It is written when I go to network preferences : Cable unplugged which is wrong. The cable is plugged and the modem is working as checked by the technician.
ethernet:
zap2
Mar 18, 05:04 PM
The only thing weird about your poll is that choice 1 & 2 are pretty much the same so why 3 choices when 2 would have sufficed.
Ya, I'd wait for 10.5, then buy the new Mac. And after that save up for you console(which I'd say not the PS3, but I'm sure you've looked at the other system, or have the both)
Ya, I'd wait for 10.5, then buy the new Mac. And after that save up for you console(which I'd say not the PS3, but I'm sure you've looked at the other system, or have the both)
Mr Slippy IV
Jul 2, 11:23 AM
If I was thinking about the Candyshell I'd just get the nude. Nice case.
Anyway, I'm liking the Rebel a lot. What am I in for with that one?
Anyway, I'm liking the Rebel a lot. What am I in for with that one?
666sheep
Apr 3, 01:14 PM
I'd say a flashed 7800GTX with 512MB is the fastest...
http://www.jcsenterprises.com/Japamacs_Page/Blog/71BBF3EF-9713-4C53-8B80-26771F8A4087.html
And it's true, especially in gaming. But some people still don't want to believe it even if it's proven many times by trustworthy testers...
http://www.barefeats.com/mutant4.html
In pro apps such as FC, Maya, C4D Quadro is unbeatable (of cards available for G5).
Hello (again) 300D.
You've beaten me :D
http://www.jcsenterprises.com/Japamacs_Page/Blog/71BBF3EF-9713-4C53-8B80-26771F8A4087.html
And it's true, especially in gaming. But some people still don't want to believe it even if it's proven many times by trustworthy testers...
http://www.barefeats.com/mutant4.html
In pro apps such as FC, Maya, C4D Quadro is unbeatable (of cards available for G5).
Hello (again) 300D.
You've beaten me :D
skiltrip
May 4, 12:08 PM
Cool. thanks guys, that's what it appeared to me, just wasn't sure.
KevinRightWing
Apr 30, 05:40 PM
Kemah here, do they have wifi's in stock?
MecPro
Aug 31, 02:54 PM
I came across this from @Danny Choo's website, quite cool pictures. My favourite has to be:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4134/4944878936_4ce0c784ee_o.jpg
It even has me thinking of getting one of those monitors!
More at the link: http://macroom.jpn.org/?mode=th_view&th=1208828794&page=1
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4134/4944878936_4ce0c784ee_o.jpg
It even has me thinking of getting one of those monitors!
More at the link: http://macroom.jpn.org/?mode=th_view&th=1208828794&page=1
Nameci
Mar 16, 07:10 AM
Please send PM.
Pixeled_Apple
Nov 11, 04:44 AM
OS X should be very easy to learn... as Palad1 says...
I am also switchin' at xmas... my veery first PB {hopefully.. but my english grades in the last test were dropping.. bad; so I'm loosin' hope.. but in Maths im strong as UNIX :p )
I am also switchin' at xmas... my veery first PB {hopefully.. but my english grades in the last test were dropping.. bad; so I'm loosin' hope.. but in Maths im strong as UNIX :p )
FourCandles
Nov 17, 10:10 AM
Another article, this time from the BBC, and with an image of southern Italy and Sicily:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11776703
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11776703
dault2
May 4, 04:21 PM
I just replaced the screen on my 15in early 2008 macbook pro. I booted it up and everything seemed to be working properly. I started messing with changing the brightness and I noticed when I turned the brightness down to one bar, the screen got really bright after a couple of seconds. Turning it down to zero bars didn't change anything.
Can someone help me????
Thank you!
Can someone help me????
Thank you!
Badger^2
May 4, 11:14 AM
I find macconnection faster, and cheaper.
http://www.macconnection.com/IPA/PM/Brands/Apple/iMac/Default.aspx
http://www.macconnection.com/IPA/PM/Brands/Apple/iMac/Default.aspx
The Mad Kiwi
Apr 11, 09:14 PM
Hi,
I wanted to ask this question a bit differently. As the title to my post says: How did you "get trapped" with the lighting equipment or "choosing" your lighting equipment !!!
igmolinav : ) !!!
Lighting isn't like buying into a camera system, you can mix and match lights. It's starting to change in that some manufactures now have control systems, but to be honest unless you've got a strobe on a boom, it's easier to just walk over to the strobe and adjust it manually.
I've got a couple of old alienbees, a couple of Profotos and I've just got a couple of Einsteins, not to mention a few Canon and Vivitar speedlites too. The only thing is that is a bit annoying is that that not all modifiers can be used on all the strobes, but you tend to use them in different ways anyway so it's not much of a problem.
Start out with cheap lights like a couple of Alienbees and when you feel you need some of the function of more expensive lights just add them and use the cheaper strobes for non key lights. You don't need a couple of $2000 strobes with a computer control unit to light a background when a couple of $200 alienbees on optical trigger will do the same job and probably better since there's less to go wrong. When location shooting it's easier to take a couple of monolights for the main lights but then use speedlites for the extra lights, they don't need to be as powerful as you won't be using them in a softboxes, they're heaps smaller, smaller lights = smaller stands, and no cables or external powerpacks.
Actually now that I think about it I don't think there is a single lighting system I could live with, none of them are really flexible enough.
I wanted to ask this question a bit differently. As the title to my post says: How did you "get trapped" with the lighting equipment or "choosing" your lighting equipment !!!
igmolinav : ) !!!
Lighting isn't like buying into a camera system, you can mix and match lights. It's starting to change in that some manufactures now have control systems, but to be honest unless you've got a strobe on a boom, it's easier to just walk over to the strobe and adjust it manually.
I've got a couple of old alienbees, a couple of Profotos and I've just got a couple of Einsteins, not to mention a few Canon and Vivitar speedlites too. The only thing is that is a bit annoying is that that not all modifiers can be used on all the strobes, but you tend to use them in different ways anyway so it's not much of a problem.
Start out with cheap lights like a couple of Alienbees and when you feel you need some of the function of more expensive lights just add them and use the cheaper strobes for non key lights. You don't need a couple of $2000 strobes with a computer control unit to light a background when a couple of $200 alienbees on optical trigger will do the same job and probably better since there's less to go wrong. When location shooting it's easier to take a couple of monolights for the main lights but then use speedlites for the extra lights, they don't need to be as powerful as you won't be using them in a softboxes, they're heaps smaller, smaller lights = smaller stands, and no cables or external powerpacks.
Actually now that I think about it I don't think there is a single lighting system I could live with, none of them are really flexible enough.
Thomas Veil
Apr 27, 04:39 PM
"The Return of Christ"? Didn't they make that movie years ago?
Followed by "The Revenge of Christ", "The Curse of Christ", "Taste the Blood of Christ", "Frankenstein Meets Christ", "Dr. Christ and the Bikini Machine", "Galilee Christ and the Temple of Doom" and of course the prequel, "Jesus the Christ and the Blustery Day".
Followed by "The Revenge of Christ", "The Curse of Christ", "Taste the Blood of Christ", "Frankenstein Meets Christ", "Dr. Christ and the Bikini Machine", "Galilee Christ and the Temple of Doom" and of course the prequel, "Jesus the Christ and the Blustery Day".
mdgm
Apr 5, 06:28 AM
The Late 09 Mini can handle 8GB RAM (2x4GB - so can the early 09 Mini, though the early 09 Mini requires a firmware update to be installed first).
I don't know if the RAM you linked to is compatible or not. Is there a reason why you're looking on eBay for RAM rather than buying it from some place else?
I don't know if the RAM you linked to is compatible or not. Is there a reason why you're looking on eBay for RAM rather than buying it from some place else?
Eso
Jan 15, 07:27 PM
However, in many ways, the metric of how many times someone gets a rumour 'right' just isn't that important to a large proportion of forum members, especially many long term members who have their own ideas about who is worth listening to on any given topic or not. Many of them might read the news threads to find out what's going on and what people are thinking, but rarely participate in the scrum.
I think it could be somewhat analogous to member titles based on a user's total number of posts. Most people probably don't care what their title is. Some people will take "newbies" less seriously than others.
In either case, member titles, avatars, and join dates are form of recognition for members of the forum. Points could be used in much the same way. Just like member titles, some people won't care what points a poster has and others will. Perhaps the term "Reputation" isn't the best. Maybe "Rumor Rank" or something (or "Gullibility" :D).
In other words, the intent is to award a specific recognition for members (that want to participate). Just like member titles are known to be based on total posts, this would be known to be based on 'rumor' stories. I didn't really mean a system to rate a user's general contribution to the site. What I meant by "giving weight to user's opinions" was just in context of discussing rumors. For example, given the track record of Kevin Rose and John Gruber - when both weigh in on an rumor, which are you more likely to believe?
Besides, many news articles may not be about rumours but instead might be about actual substantiated news, so it would seem pointless to employ opinions on these as meaning anything useful. Someone voting on whether a OS release is a good or bad idea hardly qualifies them to get a higher ranking than someone who doesn't vote.
Right; news items wouldn't be appropriate to include a vote. By the same token, some rumor items could have multiple votes. Let's take one of the recent stories, for example. iPad 2 with High Resolution Screen and SD Card Slot, iPhone 5 with A5 Processor? (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/01/14/ipad-2-with-high-resolution-screen-and-sd-card-slot-iphone-5-with-a5-processor/) There's essentially three major features up for discussion:
1) Will the iPad 2 have an SD slot?
2) Will the iPad 2 screen have a greater resolution than the current iPad?
3) Will the iPhone 5 be a dual-mode CDMA/GSM model?
Out of the 346 posts, 21% of them either directly said aspects of the rumor were true/false or posted with the assumption that it was true/false (that includes you up there, Apple OC ;)) The percentage of unique members making such a post is higher because many of them posted several times in the thread, obviously not saying what they believed of the rumor every time.
How many of these particular posters are likely to be interested in some kind of poll/vote which can potentially earn them a badge or point for their profile? Of all the other posters that discussed the rumor without saying they believed it or not, how many of them may be interested in voting on the rumor for fun?
It difficult to say how broad interest in something like this is, but I don't think it's insignificant. Currently there are awards based on seniority/posting history: avatars, member titles, forum access, etc. Since a large portion of the website is rumor-centric; having a rumor-centric award system could be a popular addition.
What if there are currently no technical means to retrospectively award 'points' to almost half a million members? Is this where Arn and co should be spending limited time and resources to develop this system or would attention be better spent elsewhere on other forum and site features?
That's certainly is a concern. I'm also aware that forum software is basically a package deal and it could be difficult to add. I have, however, used several forums that use point-based system for members. One gaming forum in particular works in basically the same way as this system would work: members have points that they can use to vote on who they think will win a match. If they are right, they are awarded points; if they are wrong, they lose points.
Also, enabling contributors to clear their slate for $25 per year would make the idea of a reputation system completely redundant, how would you know who to trust?
Hopefully I have explained what system I imagine a little bit better. Contributors being able to clear their points would be more analogous to being able to use the "MacRumors Demi-God" member title.
I think it could be somewhat analogous to member titles based on a user's total number of posts. Most people probably don't care what their title is. Some people will take "newbies" less seriously than others.
In either case, member titles, avatars, and join dates are form of recognition for members of the forum. Points could be used in much the same way. Just like member titles, some people won't care what points a poster has and others will. Perhaps the term "Reputation" isn't the best. Maybe "Rumor Rank" or something (or "Gullibility" :D).
In other words, the intent is to award a specific recognition for members (that want to participate). Just like member titles are known to be based on total posts, this would be known to be based on 'rumor' stories. I didn't really mean a system to rate a user's general contribution to the site. What I meant by "giving weight to user's opinions" was just in context of discussing rumors. For example, given the track record of Kevin Rose and John Gruber - when both weigh in on an rumor, which are you more likely to believe?
Besides, many news articles may not be about rumours but instead might be about actual substantiated news, so it would seem pointless to employ opinions on these as meaning anything useful. Someone voting on whether a OS release is a good or bad idea hardly qualifies them to get a higher ranking than someone who doesn't vote.
Right; news items wouldn't be appropriate to include a vote. By the same token, some rumor items could have multiple votes. Let's take one of the recent stories, for example. iPad 2 with High Resolution Screen and SD Card Slot, iPhone 5 with A5 Processor? (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/01/14/ipad-2-with-high-resolution-screen-and-sd-card-slot-iphone-5-with-a5-processor/) There's essentially three major features up for discussion:
1) Will the iPad 2 have an SD slot?
2) Will the iPad 2 screen have a greater resolution than the current iPad?
3) Will the iPhone 5 be a dual-mode CDMA/GSM model?
Out of the 346 posts, 21% of them either directly said aspects of the rumor were true/false or posted with the assumption that it was true/false (that includes you up there, Apple OC ;)) The percentage of unique members making such a post is higher because many of them posted several times in the thread, obviously not saying what they believed of the rumor every time.
How many of these particular posters are likely to be interested in some kind of poll/vote which can potentially earn them a badge or point for their profile? Of all the other posters that discussed the rumor without saying they believed it or not, how many of them may be interested in voting on the rumor for fun?
It difficult to say how broad interest in something like this is, but I don't think it's insignificant. Currently there are awards based on seniority/posting history: avatars, member titles, forum access, etc. Since a large portion of the website is rumor-centric; having a rumor-centric award system could be a popular addition.
What if there are currently no technical means to retrospectively award 'points' to almost half a million members? Is this where Arn and co should be spending limited time and resources to develop this system or would attention be better spent elsewhere on other forum and site features?
That's certainly is a concern. I'm also aware that forum software is basically a package deal and it could be difficult to add. I have, however, used several forums that use point-based system for members. One gaming forum in particular works in basically the same way as this system would work: members have points that they can use to vote on who they think will win a match. If they are right, they are awarded points; if they are wrong, they lose points.
Also, enabling contributors to clear their slate for $25 per year would make the idea of a reputation system completely redundant, how would you know who to trust?
Hopefully I have explained what system I imagine a little bit better. Contributors being able to clear their points would be more analogous to being able to use the "MacRumors Demi-God" member title.
Woodcrest64
Apr 6, 10:27 AM
From Computing Forever
http://computingforever.com/archives/1229
Rumor: 2011 MacBooks in 3 to 4 weeks? Black MacBook returns?
Posted on April 3, 2011 by Dave
An unconfirmed source calling themselves digiamac4471 has informed Computing Forever that the white MacBook, last updated on May 18th 2010 will be refreshed within 3 to 4 weeks and will feature new Sandy Bridge Core i3 series processors along with a ThunderBolt I/O port, a lower price point and the return of a Black chassis option. Reports have indicated that supplies of current generation white MacBooks in US Apple Retail stores have become constrained, indicating an imminent refresh of the popular consumer notebook. The black MacBook was discontinued in October of 2008 following the introduction of the then aluminum MacBook, which was later reclassified as a 13.3 inch MacBook Pro. The current white Macbook design was introduced in October of 2009 and features a unibody polycarbonate shell. The Black MacBook is expected to be made from the same material. Our source indicted that Apple wish to reintroduce the black MacBook to maintain uniformity across its consumer devices like the iPad and iPhone, which also offer black and white options, although the White iPhone 4 is not yet available.
The Return of the BlackBook?
At present there is only one stock MacBook configuration offered, which is a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo. Two models will now be on offer and preliminary spec details reveal updated Core i3 dual-core CPUs being used for the entry level model with an undisclosed clock speed. The use of Core i3 would be a first for Apple as their recently updated MacBook Pros use both Core i5 and i7 only. The i3 will be offered in the entry level white MacBook at a lower price point of $899. The remaining specs are almost identical to the entry level MacBook Pro: 4GB of RAM, 320GB Hard Drive, Intel HD 3000 GPU, 7-hours of battery life and a HD FaceTime Camera. The second MacBook option will be the black edition featuring the same specs again but offering a Core i5 2.1GHz dual-core CPU. A 500GB hard drive will also be an optional extra for an additional $60. Prices for this model will start from $1099. It appears with this refresh that Apple wishes to further differentiate the consumer MacBook lineup from the Pro series beyond just the obvious outward chassis construction differences. Solid state options continue to be lacking on the MacBooks along with the absence of memory expansion ports and support for more than 4GB of RAM.
Stay Tuned. We will have more on this story as it progresses. Watch the video below where we discuss this story further.
I sure hope this ends up being true :)
http://computingforever.com/archives/1229
Rumor: 2011 MacBooks in 3 to 4 weeks? Black MacBook returns?
Posted on April 3, 2011 by Dave
An unconfirmed source calling themselves digiamac4471 has informed Computing Forever that the white MacBook, last updated on May 18th 2010 will be refreshed within 3 to 4 weeks and will feature new Sandy Bridge Core i3 series processors along with a ThunderBolt I/O port, a lower price point and the return of a Black chassis option. Reports have indicated that supplies of current generation white MacBooks in US Apple Retail stores have become constrained, indicating an imminent refresh of the popular consumer notebook. The black MacBook was discontinued in October of 2008 following the introduction of the then aluminum MacBook, which was later reclassified as a 13.3 inch MacBook Pro. The current white Macbook design was introduced in October of 2009 and features a unibody polycarbonate shell. The Black MacBook is expected to be made from the same material. Our source indicted that Apple wish to reintroduce the black MacBook to maintain uniformity across its consumer devices like the iPad and iPhone, which also offer black and white options, although the White iPhone 4 is not yet available.
The Return of the BlackBook?
At present there is only one stock MacBook configuration offered, which is a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo. Two models will now be on offer and preliminary spec details reveal updated Core i3 dual-core CPUs being used for the entry level model with an undisclosed clock speed. The use of Core i3 would be a first for Apple as their recently updated MacBook Pros use both Core i5 and i7 only. The i3 will be offered in the entry level white MacBook at a lower price point of $899. The remaining specs are almost identical to the entry level MacBook Pro: 4GB of RAM, 320GB Hard Drive, Intel HD 3000 GPU, 7-hours of battery life and a HD FaceTime Camera. The second MacBook option will be the black edition featuring the same specs again but offering a Core i5 2.1GHz dual-core CPU. A 500GB hard drive will also be an optional extra for an additional $60. Prices for this model will start from $1099. It appears with this refresh that Apple wishes to further differentiate the consumer MacBook lineup from the Pro series beyond just the obvious outward chassis construction differences. Solid state options continue to be lacking on the MacBooks along with the absence of memory expansion ports and support for more than 4GB of RAM.
Stay Tuned. We will have more on this story as it progresses. Watch the video below where we discuss this story further.
I sure hope this ends up being true :)
BJNY
Sep 3, 09:03 AM
Hopefully, there is an store near you that sells Apple computers
where you can actually gauge for yourself how an iBook or TiBook
compares with your current setup.
where you can actually gauge for yourself how an iBook or TiBook
compares with your current setup.
markoibook
Feb 15, 01:34 PM
Interesting, but what is this emulator based on, i.e. is it QEMU or another repackaged version of Bochs?
jackiecanev2
Feb 6, 04:08 PM
Wirelessly posted (BB 8900: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_1_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7E18 Safari/528.16)
1) at 13, your body is not fully matured and neither is our voice.
1) at 13, your body is not fully matured and neither is our voice.
Hermes Monster
Feb 14, 03:56 PM
Sorry, that didn't mean to sound as shi**y as it did, I'm just confused :D
jgbr
Apr 14, 12:33 PM
a guess would do
its 1gb connections on all infrastructure
its 1gb connections on all infrastructure
makeme
Sep 16, 04:30 PM
I love my new eMac. Definitely maximize your memory to one gigabyte and you will be surprised how well it performs.
Also, you should use your student discount and get a free iPod Mini like I did. Does anybody know if you can you still do that? You should ask about that when you purchase. I purchased both my new eMac and my new iBook at the Apple Retail Store where I live and it was a wonderful experience. Everybody was very helpful and they told me about the free iPod Mini deal.
I'm a very happy owner of a new eMac, new iBook and FREE iPod Mini.
Also, you should use your student discount and get a free iPod Mini like I did. Does anybody know if you can you still do that? You should ask about that when you purchase. I purchased both my new eMac and my new iBook at the Apple Retail Store where I live and it was a wonderful experience. Everybody was very helpful and they told me about the free iPod Mini deal.
I'm a very happy owner of a new eMac, new iBook and FREE iPod Mini.
eternlgladiator
Mar 10, 03:13 PM
Of course there will be a new phone this year. Apple can't afford not to.
No comments:
Post a Comment